0300 102 9488  |  info@consumer-protection.org.uk  |  Mon–Fri 9am–5pmTrack my case  |  Alerts  |  Simple view

Guides › Insurance Claims and Complaints › Phone Insurance Claim Refused

Phone Insurance Claim Refused

Insurers must handle claims promptly and fairly and must not unreasonably reject a claim. If your phone or gadget insurance claim is refused, ask for the reason in writing and check it against your policy. Complain to the insurer, then the Financial Ombudsman Service after 8 weeks; it looks at the policy terms and the facts.

Rules checked with our Insurance Claims and Complaints guide General information, not legal advice

At a Glance

Fairlyinsurers must not unreasonably reject a claim
8 weeksfor the insurer to answer your complaint
6 monthsto go to the Ombudsman after the final response

Your Rights

What the rules say, with a link to the official source for each.

Your Rights on Claims

  • Prompt and Fair Claims

    The FCA's rules say an insurer must handle claims promptly and fairly, give you reasonable guidance to help you make a claim and appropriate updates on progress, not unreasonably reject a claim, and settle claims promptly once settlement terms are agreed (ICOBS 8.1.1R). source

  • Misrepresentation

    For consumer policies, an insurer rejecting a claim because of a misrepresentation is generally unreasonable unless it was a 'qualifying misrepresentation': you failed to take reasonable care not to misrepresent, and the insurer can show it would not have written the policy at all, or only on different terms, without it. source

  • Breaching a Condition

    Rejecting a claim because you breached a condition or warranty is generally unreasonable unless the circumstances of the claim are connected to the breach (for contracts on or after 1 August 2017, with exceptions in sections 10 and 11 of the Insurance Act 2015). source

Complaining

  • Phone and Gadget Insurance

    Make a formal complaint to the insurer first. If you are unhappy with its response, or it does not send a final response within eight weeks, you can bring it to the Financial Ombudsman Service, which weighs the facts, the law and rules, and the policy terms. source

  • 6 Months to Go to the Ombudsman

    You have 6 months from the date on the final response to refer your complaint to the Ombudsman. After that it usually cannot help, unless exceptional circumstances (such as serious ill health or bereavement) stopped you, the insurer did not send a valid final response, or the insurer agrees. source

Time Limits to Know

Miss a deadline and you can lose a right. Check the dates on your own paperwork.

  • 8 weeks
    Insurer answers your complaintThen you can go to the Financial Ombudsman Service
  • 6 months
    Refer to the OmbudsmanFrom the date of the final response

Steps to Take

Step 1 of 5

Ask the insurer for the reason for refusal in writing, quoting the policy wording it relies on.

Step 2 of 5

Gather proof: purchase receipt, police reference for theft, network report for unauthorised use, photos of damage.

Step 3 of 5

Complain in writing if the reason seems unfair. We do not take insurance or banking complaints as cases, but our free letter templates can help you write to the firm.

Step 4 of 5

If the claim was about a lost or stolen phone, check whether your network's unauthorised use limit helps too.

Step 5 of 5

After 8 weeks, or a final response, go to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

(Tap the numbers to reveal steps)

Where to Go If It Is Not Put Right

Your options, in order, and when each one applies.

The Insurer's Complaints Team

Always start here, in writing.

Financial Ombudsman Service

After 8 weeks, or within 6 months of the final response. Free.

Good to Know

Small things that make your complaint stronger.

Many policies need theft reported to the police and the network quickly. Check your policy's deadlines.

Want Help?

If you would like one of our team to look at your problem, our initial case review is free. We cannot guarantee any outcome and we do not give legal advice.

Start your case
Luke Marley

Lead reviewer

Luke Marley

Founder and Lead Reviewer

Luke founded CPUK in 2026 after seeing how hard it is for ordinary people to get problems with companies put right. He oversees our guides and checks them against official sources.

Research by Katie Burt, Co-founder and Operations Lead (17 years in the care sector, including managing services for vulnerable adults), and the CPUK Research Team. Researched with AI-assisted research tools, then checked and corrected by our team.

Last checked: 13 October 2026. We are not paid by the companies we write about. Adverts never affect our guidance. Read our editorial policy.

Free Scam and Recall Alerts

Plain-English scam warnings, product recalls and consumer-law changes by email. We email you about this only, and you confirm your address first. Unsubscribe at any time.

See our privacy notice.

Start your case